Sunday, February 14, 2016

Notes for Sunday School Class: Open Theism

Open Theism

I.               Defining Openness
A.   God does not possess exhaustive foreknowledge
1.     God knows as much as he can know
2.     God knows per quantity
3.     Redefines omniscience
B.    God experiences time as we do
1.     Experiences change
2.     Can be surprised
C.    God experiences emotions as we do
1.     Can change his mind
2.     Denies anthropopathism as an explanation of God’s emotions
II.             History
A.   Classical Arminianism
1.     “Simple foreknowledge”
a)     God looks ahead to see what will take place
b)    God knows concretely the future free actions of moral beings
2.     A Problem
a)     Creatures are free to do a or non-a
b)    God knows the future
                                                                              i.         “Looking ahead” presumes God is subject to time
                                                                             ii.         “The Future” exists apart from God
c)     Logical inconsistency
B.    Process Theology
1.     Liberal, non-evangelical
2.     God is static in classical theism
3.     They say God is dynamic, he is constantly changing
III.           Scripture references
A.   Gen 22:1-19
1.     God gives Abraham a task to see his response
2.     The test is an “actual” test
3.     God doesn’t know what Abraham’s response will be
B.    1 Sam 15:11, 35
1.     Saul commanded to destroy everything
2.     Saul spared the king and some animals
3.     Lord regrets he made Saul king
C.    Gen 6:6
1.     Violence fills the earth, man is evil continually
2.     The Lord regrets making man
3.     The Lord decides to send a flood
D.   Jonah 4:2
1.     Jonah sent to Ninevah to deliver message of repentance
2.     Jonah knew they would, and that God would forgive
3.     Jonah attempted to flee to Tarshish
4.     God sent the fish, Jonah relented, and Ninevah repented
IV.           Theology
A.   Linear temporality
1.     Focus on the economic Trinity
2.     Dismissal of the ontological Trinity
3.     Limitation of Eternality
a)     God experiences time
b)    God’s knowledge is not exhaustive
B.    God is like us
1.     Openness denies Biblical anthropomorphisms
a)     Anthropomorphism- giving human attributes to a non-human
b)    Anthropopathism- giving human emotions to a non-human
c)     In order for God to relate with us, he needs to have “actual” feelings
2.     Passibility
a)     God exhibits, and has, “actual” emotions
b)    Circumstances “actually” affect God
C.    Omniscience
1.     God knows everything he can know
2.     “Quantitative”
3.     No qualitative difference
D.   Counseling
1.     God changes his plans based on changes in time
2.     God can will one thing, and then something different
3.     God can “write a new song”
4.     God is not ultimately responsible for any evil

Orthodox Beliefs
I.               Scripture
A.   Is 40-48
1.     41:21-22
a.     Declaration of the future
b.     Purpose of the past
2.     46:8-11
a.     God has declared the future
b.     God brings it to pass
c.     God has purpose in events
d.     God will do as he has decreed
e.     God does whatever he desires
B.    Ps 139:4
C.    Rom 8:29-30
D.   Gen 22:1-19
a.     Heb 11:19
b.     If God knows all he can know, then he knows what people are thinking- how did he not know Abraham’s resolve?
E.    1Sam 15
a.     1Sam 15:29
b.     1Sam 13:13-14
c.     Gen 49:10
F.    Gen 6:6
G.   Jonah 4:2
II.             Theology
A.   Ontological Trinity
1.     Must be able to discuss God apart from his works
2.     Must be able to discuss God as he is in himself
3.     His knowledge of future events is directly linked to his existence outside of time
B.    Theology Proper
1.     Ex 3:14
a.     “I am who I am”
b.     Self- definitional
c.     Self- reliant
d.     Present
2.     Modalistic Governmentalism
a.     Attributes exist in modes of one another
b.     Certain attributes are communicably subjective
1.     God must be objective
2.     Moral attributes must be objective in particular
c.     Certain attributes must govern the definitions of other attributes
3.     Aseity
a.     Necessary, non-contingent
b.     Self-determining
4.     Infinite
a.     Simple
                                                                              i.         Not comprised of parts
                                                                             ii.         Indivisible
b.     Eternal
1.     Timeless
2.     Not constrained by time
3.     Non-linear temporality
4.     Exists wholly in an indivisible, non-successive, comprehensive present
c.     Love
1.     Objective vs. Subjective
                                                                                       i.         “Dr. Evil” scenario
                                                                                      ii.         Limited vs. Unlimited atonement
d.     Must be governed by holiness, and ultimately aseity
5.     Omniscient
a.     Simple
b.     Indivisible
c.     Eternal
d.     Present
e.     Necessary knowledge
1.     God’s knowledge of what must be
2.     God’s knowledge of himself
f.      Free or contingent knowledge
1.     God’s knowledge of what could be
2.     God’s knowledge of possible and actual

3.     Knows his works as contingent, dependent upon his choices and could be otherwise than it is

No comments:

Post a Comment